Post by sharkcode on Sept 5, 2011 13:30:37 GMT -5
Hi, I'm new here and I need help.
I'll be direct: Jono doesn't like me and I feel the same about him. Things never messed us since we just played some times together and I never needed him for nothing until the day I sent a replay for TADRS.
What happened: he made the review of the game I sent (me versus the player called Dakar) and gave us a 0 (zero) rate, although we have a four, three and another rates on the assessed skills.
I'm to ask if someone else could review the game because if I was a serious reviewer (and not a child one), I would never give a rate like that for anyone, even for a newbie that made nothing in the game, since I think people shouldn't be arrogant and enough prepotent to think they never could learn something from a game and a zero is incompatible with that.
I think a ZERO rate should be given to players that didn't attacked each other even one time on the whole game and did nothing, because to attack you have to build something, if you build something you must have a minimum skill of building and unit control. So, a zero is a really hard rate to give and I'm not a noob that doesn't make nothing in a game and deserve that.
I'm playing TA about ten years and about five on line. I stayed seven months away from TA and I'm going back slowly (there are about three weeks) and even so, I think I didn't deserve that game's grade.
I think if Jono have something against me (and I know he has, because I also have, since I don't like his arrogant posture with me for many times but I never tried to harm him), he shouldn't let this affect his judgment, because the criteria used are more objective than personal feelings about the person who you are reviewing the game of. If he can't deal with this kind of situation, I think he shouldn't review games, because you have to be a minimum impartial to make a good review (and I know what I'm talking about, because I'm a Lawyer and impartiality is an essencial element of Law, Rights and Judgements).
So, could anyone give me a second opinion about the game I sent? Even I gain a second zero, I won't be angry and nothing about that, because I will know (and I hope so) the person that will make the review won't be nothing against me or let his personal feelings afect the review and I'll have a fair trial.
Cordially.
Diego Emmanuel F. Pinheiro (S_SharkCode).
Regards from Brazil.
I'll be direct: Jono doesn't like me and I feel the same about him. Things never messed us since we just played some times together and I never needed him for nothing until the day I sent a replay for TADRS.
What happened: he made the review of the game I sent (me versus the player called Dakar) and gave us a 0 (zero) rate, although we have a four, three and another rates on the assessed skills.
I'm to ask if someone else could review the game because if I was a serious reviewer (and not a child one), I would never give a rate like that for anyone, even for a newbie that made nothing in the game, since I think people shouldn't be arrogant and enough prepotent to think they never could learn something from a game and a zero is incompatible with that.
I think a ZERO rate should be given to players that didn't attacked each other even one time on the whole game and did nothing, because to attack you have to build something, if you build something you must have a minimum skill of building and unit control. So, a zero is a really hard rate to give and I'm not a noob that doesn't make nothing in a game and deserve that.
I'm playing TA about ten years and about five on line. I stayed seven months away from TA and I'm going back slowly (there are about three weeks) and even so, I think I didn't deserve that game's grade.
I think if Jono have something against me (and I know he has, because I also have, since I don't like his arrogant posture with me for many times but I never tried to harm him), he shouldn't let this affect his judgment, because the criteria used are more objective than personal feelings about the person who you are reviewing the game of. If he can't deal with this kind of situation, I think he shouldn't review games, because you have to be a minimum impartial to make a good review (and I know what I'm talking about, because I'm a Lawyer and impartiality is an essencial element of Law, Rights and Judgements).
So, could anyone give me a second opinion about the game I sent? Even I gain a second zero, I won't be angry and nothing about that, because I will know (and I hope so) the person that will make the review won't be nothing against me or let his personal feelings afect the review and I'll have a fair trial.
Cordially.
Diego Emmanuel F. Pinheiro (S_SharkCode).
Regards from Brazil.