|
Post by blackflag on Mar 31, 2011 1:32:37 GMT -5
VOTE4ME!
|
|
|
Post by LoC_Boogieman on Mar 31, 2011 11:27:41 GMT -5
Gin FTW! ;D
|
|
|
Post by blackflag on Apr 1, 2011 22:16:39 GMT -5
this is what the madness is all about...http://tadrs.tauniverse.com/index.php?showgame=t&go=all&id=1866. unfinished epic c2c game. watch and vote hf!
|
|
|
Post by gincola on Apr 3, 2011 3:45:00 GMT -5
yo i need to review a game, yall sign a petition for me to get a reviewing account ahight?
|
|
|
Post by locmachine on Apr 3, 2011 10:41:59 GMT -5
Gin your reviews are such shit, that they make me want to rip my eyes from their sockets and stab them with a rusty screw driver. ...And you always review your own games like a fuckhead.
|
|
|
Post by blackflag on Apr 8, 2011 2:13:29 GMT -5
i dunno gin but i think i know who WOULDNT sign it....
|
|
|
Post by protein on Apr 8, 2011 18:19:41 GMT -5
Was a nice game to watch indeed. Even though I am an ancient player I have the following comments for both players: For Gincola: You should have stayed on pels which might have very likely won the game if combined with your sea forces. At times I had the feeling you could not decide which way to go. Your unit handling was far superior compared to blacky's though. For Blacky: Use your bombers, don't collect them A few scouts in your air production queue would have worked wonders for finding worthy targets for them (e.g. You could have taken out Gin's sea production easily if you would've known where those shipyards were). You were way too careful. Scout, scout, scout... Final thoughts: You both have sharp teeth but it is clear that you both respected each other a bit too much. This was displayed in Gin's indecisiveness which way to go and in blacky's relative passive behaviour. Except unit handling I would vote all other areas in favour of blacky. I come to this conclusion because his excessive amount of bombers and growing sea superiority in the last 10 mins of the game. My 2 cents :-) Protein
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 8, 2011 19:56:45 GMT -5
what the fuck?
|
|
|
Post by protein on Apr 12, 2011 15:41:46 GMT -5
...and that means? Enlighten me
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 12, 2011 18:27:26 GMT -5
You asked me on zone what i mean by what the fuck... its obvious
You say you have the ''following comments'' for both players, but instead you give them ''POINTERS'' which is just rediculous.
|
|
|
Post by protein on Apr 13, 2011 3:46:51 GMT -5
Sigh... I can see that nothing has changed during my long absence. There is still the occasional foul mouthed troll around who knows it all and just cannot resist to give a "useful" contribution to get attention! Thank you so much for enriching our all experience with this holy grail of knowledge of yours. Please do us all a favour and keep your opinion to yourself next time or first learn how to properly communicate before you hit that reply button?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 13, 2011 20:55:07 GMT -5
Well don't ask me what i mean next time then? Dickwad.
|
|
|
Post by blackflag on Apr 14, 2011 17:05:43 GMT -5
pro, you are right i do play passively especially on small micro maps like c2c cuz i want the fight to come to me. the reason for the bomber horde was cuz i wanted to use them 1 at a time... or maybe 5 to take out a plant etc... i really REALLY dont like using more than that at a time... and as far as scouting, well the bombers do that for me usually i end up bombing crus on c2c. but i like to think of my passiveness as patience. i used to lose so much cuz of restlessness from battle fatigue now i just think of it as ive already won its just not official yet and that usually prevents me from sending units to slaughter, not to say its good all the time but i think its helped me more than hurt.
|
|
|
Post by FiN_Tiptushi on Apr 14, 2011 17:43:13 GMT -5
Being careful is virtue on that map imo.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 14, 2011 20:18:02 GMT -5
I must watch this game and see for myself. 2moro
|
|